Hierarchy without inferiority

Used to argue that headship does not imply inferiority of essence, just as ordered roles in marriage do not erase shared human nature.

The caller cited Paul's headship language to argue that the Father is over Christ, while the host answered that role subordination does not deny equality of nature.

Raised as an objection about the Son's continued subordination to the Father, prompting an explanation of relational hierarchy alongside shared divine identity.

Used analogically to argue that hierarchy or rank does not necessarily erase obligation or mutual duty between parties in different roles.

Used to explain that the Father remains the God of all flesh even after Jesus' resurrection, since Jesus still possesses glorified human nature.

The host used this verse about believers doing 'greater works' to argue that 'greater' can mean greater extent or quantity, not superior nature, when interpreting 'the Father is...