Used to argue that Jews are still held accountable to the Torah they possess, which the speaker treats as evidence that their scripture was not wholly invalidated.

Used as a rebuttal to 2:79 by arguing that the same surah still treats Jewish scripture as authoritative and complete enough to obey.

Cited to argue that Muslims cannot claim the Quran confirms only part of prior scripture while rejecting the rest.

Repeated later in rebuttal to reinforce the argument that one cannot believe part of scripture and reject the rest.

Discussed in relation to whether selective legal obedience counts as believing part of a book and rejecting part.