Quoted by the Christian caller as an analogy for abrogation or change in divine designation, arguing that God could permit one title in an earlier period and later prohibit it.
GODLOGIC VS HAMZA'S DEN LIVE DEBATE
Unmapped reference
Hosea 2:16 - 00:02:02
- 1UnmappedBibleReferenceQuranic abrogation
Unmapped reference
Quran 39:4 - 00:08:40
- 1UnmappedQuranReferenceJesus' Divinity and Sonship
Cited by the Muslim panel as a rhetorical conditional about divine sonship: even if Allah intended to take a son, He would choose from creation. The Christian caller used the sa...
Unmapped reference
Quran 43:81 - 00:10:07
- 1UnmappedQuranReferenceJesus' Divinity and Sonship
Cited by the Muslim panel to reinforce that Quranic sonship language is hypothetical and rhetorical: if the Most Merciful had offspring, the Prophet would be first to worship ac...
Unmapped reference
Quran 19:91-93 - 00:13:28
- 1UnmappedQuranReferenceJesus' Divinity and Sonship
Requested by the Christian caller and discussed by the panel as a passage saying it is unfitting to attribute a son to Allah and that all beings come only as servants, not divin...
Unmapped reference
Colossians 1:15 - 00:19:42
- 1UnmappedBibleReferenceJesus' Divinity and Sonship
Paraphrased by a Muslim speaker as 'Jesus was the firstborn of all creation' to argue that Christian scripture can speak of sonship in a way tied to creation rather than literal...
Unmapped reference
Quran 6:101 - 00:31:53
- 1UnmappedQuranReferenceJesus' Divinity and Sonship
Central text in the exchange about whether Allah would need a mate to have a son. The Christian caller argued the verse implies dependence on a mate, while the Muslim panel answ...
- Colossians 1:1511 citation
- Hosea 2:1611 citation
- Quran 19:91-9311 citation
- Quran 39:411 citation
- Quran 43:8111 citation