Cited to argue that the Son of Man receives dominion, glory, and an everlasting kingdom, implying shared divine rule that conflicts with Islamic theology.
Scripture spotlight
Daniel 7:13-14
bible
13 I saw in the night-visions, and, behold, there came with the clouds of the sky one like a son of man, and he came even to the ancient of days, and they brought him near before him. 14 There was given him dominion, and glory, and a kingdom, that all the peoples, nations, and languages should serve him: his dominion is an everlasting dominion, which shall not pass away, and his kingdom that which shall not be destroyed.
Daniel's Son of Man vision was cited to argue that one figure receives everlasting dominion and universal service, which the hosts used to support a divine messianic reading against a collectivist 'saints/Israel' reading.
Used to explain the 'Son of Man' title as a divine figure who comes with the clouds and receives everlasting dominion and universal service.
A superchat cited the Son of Man vision as evidence for an early 'two powers in heaven' or proto-trinitarian reading of the Old Testament.
Used to argue 'Son of Man' is a Danielic divine-royal title, not merely a generic human label.