5 HOURS Of COOKING Muslims & Heretics On Jesus Being GOD ALMIGHTY...(LIVE DEBATES)

A viewer recommended this Qur'an verse as a starting text for discussing the 'Islamic dilemma,' i.e., whether the Qur'an sends people to earlier scriptures for confirmation.

A viewer recommended this verse alongside Qur'an 10:94 as part of a suggested starting point for arguing that the Qur'an affirms earlier scripture.

This verse was used by a caller to argue that the Father alone is 'the only true God'; the host answered that the wording does not exclude the Son from sharing the one divine na...

A caller used this text about Abraham being told to 'be blameless' to challenge the claim that only Jesus was perfect/sinless in a unique sense.

This verse about Noah being 'blameless in his generation' was cited to argue that biblical language about blamelessness does not automatically mean lifelong sinlessness like Chr...

The host supplied this messianic text while discussing Old Testament support for Jesus' divine identity.

Although the caller misnamed the chapter, the discussion clearly turned to this verse ('before I formed you in the womb I knew you') to argue that divine foreknowledge does not ...

The host used this verse to argue that the New Testament explicitly identifies Jesus as the one who saved Israel out of Egypt, thereby placing Jesus in Old Testament divine action.

This verse was central to the host's argument that the Qur'an 'confirms what is with' Jews and Christians, so it cannot coherently claim their scriptures were already textually ...

The host cited this passage to argue that the Qur'an explicitly says it confirms the Torah and Gospel, which he used against the claim that those books were already corrupted in...

The host used this verse to argue that the Qur'an condemns believing part of scripture while rejecting the rest, undercutting the move to accept only 'some' of the Torah/Gospel.

This verse was used to argue that Allah himself 'prays' or has salawat upon believers, so a Muslim objection that 'God cannot pray' would backfire on Islam as well.

The host cited this Qur'an verse ('He is the First and the Last') to compare Allah's unique title with Jesus' claim to be the First and the Last, arguing that Jesus shares divin...

A caller asked about this theophany text, and the host read it as evidence of plurality within Yahweh's self-revelation in the Old Testament.

The host walked through this vision of the Ancient of Days and the Son of Man to argue that both share the divine rule and receive service proper to the Most High.

The host cited this verse to argue that the Aramaic form behind 'Most High' is plural here, supporting his reading that both the Ancient of Days and Son of Man share that identity.

This verse was used to reinforce the same Daniel 7 argument, since the host claimed it contains both singular and plural uses of 'Most High/Most Highs.'

An ex-Jehovah's Witness appealed to this verse ('God is spirit') to push back against Trinitarian talk about God as 'person'; the host answered by using 'person' in a philosophi...

The host cited this verse to argue that Jesus shared divine glory with the Father before the world existed, supporting Christ's eternal preexistence.

The host used this verse to argue that everything that came into existence came through the Word, so the Word himself cannot be a created being.

This verse was discussed because of the phrase 'the beginning of God's creation'; the host argued that 'arche' means source/origin, not first creature.

The host appealed to the first-commandment context from this passage to frame the claim that worship belongs only to Jehovah, then argued that worshiping Jesus is valid only if ...

This command was cited to show that Jesus himself upheld worship of the Lord alone; the host then argued that this does not exclude Jesus because Jesus shares the divine identity.

The host used this verse to argue that the Son must be honored just as the Father is honored, and pressed that such honor includes worship.

This Shema text was invoked by the ex-Jehovah's Witness to insist Jehovah is one God and therefore Jesus should not be worshiped as Jehovah.

A caller cited this verse to argue that the Word was both 'with God' and 'was God,' claiming this implies two gods; the host answered with Trinitarian distinctions of person and...

This verse was used by a caller to argue that the unseen God and the 'begotten God/Son' are distinct in a way that suggests more than one god; the host rejected that reading.

The host cited this section to answer objections from 'the Father is greater than I,' arguing that the same context also shows the Spirit is sent in Jesus' name and that Jesus h...

This psalm was mentioned as David's repentance after sin, to contrast biblical prophets who confess wrongdoing with Muhammad allegedly justifying wrongdoing as divinely approved.

The host used this divorce verse to argue that the Qur'an assigns a waiting period to girls who have not yet menstruated, implying marriages to prepubescent girls are contemplat...

This verse was paired with Qur'an 65:4 to argue that a waiting period only applies after marital sexual contact, so the girls in 65:4 are not merely betrothed but consummated wi...

The host cited Ibn Kathir's commentary on Qur'an 65:4 to show that a major Sunni exegete explicitly understood the verse to include girls too young to menstruate.

Ibn Kathir referenced this verse while explaining that women who do menstruate normally have a different waiting-period calculation, contrasting them with those too young or too...

A superchat cited this verse as if Jesus were speaking there; the host pointed out that such a use would ironically imply Jesus is the divine speaker in Numbers.