DEBATE: Is Islam True? | Fearless Truth Vs Nadir Ahmed

Cited to argue that the New Testament blames the Jews for Jesus's death and thereby seeds anti-Jewish hostility that Islam later corrects.

Presented as the Quranic correction that denies the Jews killed Jesus and is therefore said to remove a theological cause of persecution.

Raised as a biblical example behind virginity testing so Islam can be framed as morally correcting an abusive teaching.

Used to argue that the Messiah must suffer and die for the sins of the people, which the speaker says Muhammad contradicts.

Quoted to argue that Yahweh himself is pierced, so the Messiah's identity supports a divine reading incompatible with Islam.

Cited as evidence that the Messiah's origins are from everlasting, reinforcing the claim that Islamic teaching breaks with earlier prophecy.

Used to argue that David speaks of the Messiah in divine terms and therefore supports a high Christology.

Brought in to counter the claim that Islam removed anti-Jewish violence by citing an end-times tradition about Muslims fighting Jews.

Questioned as a historical problem because the debate turns on whether Yahya was really the first person given that name.

Raised as a challenge to peaceful readings of Islam by quoting the verse about striking unbelievers in battle.

Offered in reply as a battlefield rule that supposedly restrains warfare and supports the claim that the Quran regulates combat morally.

One of the embryology passages cited to challenge whether the Quran's language about human development is scientifically accurate.

Grouped with other development verses in a question about whether the Quran's embryological descriptions amount to scientific error.

Included alongside other embryology citations as part of a broader challenge to the Quran's scientific reliability.

Used in a polytheism exchange to argue over how the Quran speaks about divine oneness and the accusation against Christian belief.

Paired with another surah in an argument about whether Quranic monotheism undercuts Christian claims about God.

Cited as a standard for rejecting any angelic message that preaches another gospel, making it a direct argument against Muhammad's claim to prophethood.

Raised in a question about whether the appearance of Jesus's crucifixion deceived only his enemies or also his followers and other witnesses.

Cited in a question meant to challenge whether Muhammad's reported approval of deception should make listeners doubt his revelations.

Grouped with other deception-related citations to argue that Muhammad's conduct undermines confidence in his prophetic authority.

Included with Bukhari and Muslim references to press the claim that deception in wartime or strategy weakens trust in Muhammad's revelations.

Named with the deception challenge as a Quranic proof-text the questioner thinks complicates trust in Muhammad's message.

Used defensively to argue that the Bible itself contains language about God sending delusion, so Christians cannot object to accusations of divine deception.

Cited as Old Testament evidence that God's self-reference is plural, supporting a multi-personal understanding of God.

Used to identify the angel of the Lord with Yahweh as part of a Trinitarian reading of the Old Testament.

Paired with Exodus 3 to argue that multiple persons share the divine name Yahweh while remaining one God.

Reused as the speaker's strongest proof that Islam brought peace by denying Jewish responsibility for Jesus's death.