Jesus Is The Most High God... Change My Mind | Live debates

A Muslim guest cited this verse to argue that doing good deeds is enough for salvation, so belief about Jesus' deity supposedly does not matter.

The host paraphrased Jesus' warning to argue that rejecting Jesus' true identity leads to dying in sin, directly countering the claim that belief about Jesus is unimportant.

Cited to argue that Muhammad claimed the Torah and Gospel present with Jews and Christians still testified about him.

Quoted as a foundational monotheism text to argue there is only one God, against tritheistic or polytheistic readings.

Appealed to during debate over whether the Father and Son are merely united in purpose or also share the same divine reality; the host argued the prayer shows divine prerogative...

Used to argue that the Spirit of the Lord is identified with the God/Rock of Israel, supporting the Spirit's deity.

Cited to show the Spirit of God was active in creation from the beginning.

Quoted to argue that the Spirit creates and gives life, reinforcing the Spirit's divine status.

Raised in connection with Jesus' "ye are gods" argument; the host used it to say Jesus was referring to unjust judges, not denying his own unique divine claim.

Explained as the Old Testament backdrop for "ye are gods," with the host saying it refers to human judges who are condemned for unjust judgment.

Quoted in a back-and-forth about whether divine attributes can be veiled or withheld; the host used Allah's veil of light to argue that even in Islamic sources God's glory can b...

Used to argue that the Quran itself describes Jesus as Allah's word and a spirit from him, suggesting Jesus is more than a mere human prophet.

Brought up to add that the "word from Allah" has a name, the Messiah, strengthening the argument that the Quran gives Jesus an exceptional status.

The host cited this chapter to say unbelievers suppress the truth in unrighteousness, applying it polemically to Muslim denials of clear biblical teaching.

Used against modalism to argue that Jesus distinguishes his own will from the will of the one who sent him, implying personal distinction between Father and Son.

Cited to argue that Jesus and the Father function as two witnesses, not one person playing two roles, again challenging modalism.

A Muslim guest cited this verse ('the Father is greater than I') to deny Jesus' equality with God; the host responded by reading the wider context.

The host read this section to argue that Jesus' words 'whoever has seen me has seen the Father' present him as the visible revelation of God, not a mere prophet.

A Muslim guest appealed to this verse ('my Father...') to argue Jesus is subordinate and therefore not God; it was part of a challenge to Jesus' deity.

Used to argue that Jesus invites believers to ask him directly and promises to do what is asked, which the host treated as a divine claim.

The host quoted this text ('Your throne, O God, is forever and ever') as a case where the Father addresses the Son as God.

Cited to show that Allah is called 'the First and the Last'; the host used it polemically to compare this title with divine titles applied to Jesus.

The host cited this hadith to argue that Islamic tradition teaches Jews or Christians are substituted into hell in place of Muslims, using it as a moral and theological critique...

Quoted to argue that people have no valid standing unless they uphold the Torah, Gospel, and other revelation from God; the host used it to say Islam depends on earlier scriptures.

Raised to explain the title 'Everlasting Father'; the host interpreted it as meaning Jesus is the source or giver of eternal life, not that he is the person of the Father.

Repeatedly paraphrased ('in the beginning was the Word') in discussion of the Son as the divine Word and his preexistence.

Discussed as evidence that Christ had equality with God yet humbled himself by taking servant form; used to argue his subordinate role was voluntary, not proof he lacked deity.

Brought up to show a triadic formula distinguishing Jesus, God, and the Holy Spirit, supporting personal distinction within the Godhead.

Quoted in a later exchange about the Son's status to show God has spoken through the Son, who is the exact imprint of God's nature and upholds all things.

Used to argue that all things were created through and for the Son and that all things hold together in him, supporting the Son's full divine status.

Quoted to show that all things were delivered to the Son by the Father and that the Son uniquely reveals the Father; used in debate over whether this implies derived authority o...