Proving Jesus Is The MOST HIGH GOD For 3 Hours Straight! [LIVE DEBATES]@TheWordandI

A caller used this verse to argue that Jesus denied being God by saying only God is good.

The host appealed to Jesus calling himself the 'good shepherd' to rebut the claim that Mark 10:18 denies Jesus' goodness or divinity.

The host named the Hafs Quran as one of multiple Quran copies/readings to challenge the Muslim claim that there is only one Quran.

The host named the Warsh Quran as one of multiple Quran copies/readings to challenge the Muslim claim that there is only one Quran.

The host named the Qalun Quran as one of multiple Quran copies/readings to challenge the Muslim claim that there is only one Quran.

The host used this text to argue that the Father explicitly calls the Son 'God/Elohim,' undermining the objection that Jesus cannot be God if he calls the Father God.

A challenger cited the Shema to insist there is only one God and therefore rejected the Son's deity.

A challenger used this monotheism text alongside Deuteronomy 6:4 to argue against Jesus being God.

A challenger appealed to this verse to argue that 'elohim' can be used for humans/judges, so Hebrews 1:8 need not mean the Son is truly God.

The host used these verses to argue that the Father applies creator-and-Lord language to the Son, not merely honorific language.

This psalm was cited because Hebrews 1 draws from it; the host argued that a Yahweh text from Psalm 102 is applied to the Son.

A challenger cited this verse to argue that God does not change, so incarnation would imply an impossible change in God.

The hosts used this verse to argue that the Father sends the Spirit in Jesus' name, showing Jesus shares divine authority rather than being diminished by acting in the Father's ...

The host cited this passage to argue that God swears by his own name alone; therefore the Father's acting in Jesus' name indicates Jesus shares divine status.

A challenger used this verse to argue that the Father is greater than Jesus; the hosts answered that 'greater' refers to role, not divine essence.

A challenger cited this verse to argue that God is spirit and therefore not man.

A challenger used this verse to argue that God is not a man; the host responded that the context is about God not lying or changing his mind like humans do.

This verse was cited alongside Numbers 23:19 to reinforce the objection that God is not man.

The hosts used this prophecy to argue that the coming Davidic Messiah is called 'Yahweh our righteousness,' so the Messiah is identified with Yahweh.

A superchat cited this verse to challenge Trinitarianism by asking who the 'only true God' is; the host replied that this does not negate the Son's divinity.

A superchat used this verse to argue that denying the Son means not having the Father, in support of honoring Jesus as divine.

In his conversion testimony, Ali cited this verse to emphasize God's love and salvation through the giving of the Son.

Ali cited this chapter to contrast Christian love with what he experienced in Islam and to explain why Christ drew him.

Ali used this verse to describe his conversion as becoming a new creation in Christ.

Ali cited this verse about persecution to frame violence against converts as something Jesus foretold.

Ali cited this verse to explain the cost of following Jesus, including leaving family behind.

Ali cited this verse to emphasize that Jesus calls believers friends, highlighting personal love and relationship with Christ.

The host cited the standard biblical text first in order to compare it with a Targum reading about the Memra/Word acting in Exodus.

The host cited the standard text before contrasting it with a Targum to argue about the Memra/Word as a personal agent who knew and sent Moses.

The host cited Acts 13 to argue that the Holy Spirit speaks, appoints, and sends, which supports the Spirit's personhood rather than treating the Spirit as an impersonal force.

A Benitarian challenger used this passage to argue that the Father-Son oneness is only unity, because believers are also said to be 'one' in the same way.

The hosts used this verse to distinguish the disciples' gifted glory from Jesus' unique glory that he had with the Father before the world's foundation.

The hosts used this verse to argue that Jesus possessed divine glory with the Father before the world existed and later asked to receive it again after his mission.

The hosts cited this verse to argue that believers must follow Jesus and will later be honored by the Father, distinguishing promised believer-glory from Christ's eternal preexi...

A challenger cited Jesus' conversation with Nicodemus about being 'born from above' to argue that similar birth-language applies to believers, not only to the Son's relationship...